Z—a. “Mormonism: Scene in a Stage Coach.” Christian Watchman
Z—a. “Mormonism: Scene in a Stage Coach.” Christian Watchman (Boston) 18, no. 18 (5
May 1837): 1. Reprinted from Buffalo Spectator, circa April 1837.
From the Buffalo Spectator.
MORMONISM.
SCENE IN A STAGE COACH.
Soon after I took my seat, I ascertained there was a Mormon in the stage, and that he was
one of their preachers: from which circumstance, I was led to hope that he was a man of
sufficient substance to feel an argument. As soon as a favorable opportunity presented itself, I
introduced the subject, by saying that I wished for some information which I presumed he could
give, respecting the mode of defending their scheme, against certain objections that were brought
against it,—and which, could they be brought against the christian religion, I could not answer,
nor could I receive this religion with its claims, as having come from God.
I begged of him, therefore, at the outset, to answer the following questions: as they
contained principles upon which all I had to say of Mormons or Mormonism, was founded. “In
proving the scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be from God, do we not place much
reliance on that which is called internal evidence?” He could not answer, for it was apparent to
all, he did not know what was internal testimony. I asked again, “Do we not depend on that
which is properly circumstantial evidence?” Here again he attempted to reply, without
discovering to us all, his utter ignorance of the meaning of the terms; but that was impossible. He
showed himself a perfect baby here. I next shaped my question, so as to give an example of the
kind of argument to which I referred. “Do you not know,” said I, “that a book, which should lay
claim to high antiquity, pretending to contain an account of what had taken place six or eight
hundred years ago, should it contain such terms as “gunpowder, steam-engine, or rail-road car,”
would not need any other proof of its falsity, since it is impossible, in the very nature of things,
for those terms to exist before the things for which they stand;—unless an effect can exist before
its cause?” Here, again, he refused to say, “yea,” or “nay,” for reasons best known to himself.
After waiting some time, I put to him a plainer case:—“Suppose this man by my side pulls out of
his pocket a book, which he pronounces a faithful account of certain enterprises which were said
to have been undertaken in the reign of the Czars—in the course of the narration, it was found
necessary to use the terms, “mariner’s compass,” in the way they are frequently used at the
present day;—should I not be authorized to declare, as soon as my eye caught a glimpse of these
terms, “Sir, your story is false?” The mariner’s compass was not in being then: the terms
themselves are proof that your whole story is a fabrication.”
His answers from first to last indicated a pitiable ignorance of every thing that pertains to
correct reasoning. He neither knew what was internal evidence, nor what was external: Nay, he
did not know any thing; he would hesitate, and stammer, then unsay what he had just said, then
advance, then retire from what he had just advanced,—till sick of the silly enterprise of
undeceiving a fool, I told him I was deceived, disappointed, chagrined, and mortified, as I had
expected, from the circumstance that he was one of the priesthood, that I should find him capable
of discerning his right hand from his left. He replied, by saying, it was not the first time he had
been called a fool. I could not help feeling a strong desire, that after being told it a few times
more, he would believe it.
Some of the passengers expressed a desire that I should point out the circumstances
which I had in mind, and which appeared to me abundant proofs of the falsity of the whole
Mormon story.
I stated that I had read the book of Mormon enough to find in the terms, “gunpowder,
mariner’s compass,” and several others of recent origin, introduced into a silly story of the
exploits of one “Nephi,” who, it appears, was rather a conspicuous character in the affair, and the
story related to events which were said to have transpired about the time of Cyrus, say seven or
eight hundred years before Christ! There are also references to pistols and other fire arms; and,
what caps the climax for absurdity, we find a literal quotation from Shakspeare, in a narration of
an occurrence some six or seven hundred years before the Christian era. When I named this, the
passengers burst into an involuntary laugh, and one which was something increased by the poor
Mormon, who remarked, that he presumed the line to which I referred, was borrowed by
Shakspeare himself from the book of Mormon!!
This idea, I confess, had so much of the novel about it, that I could not help joining with
them in the laugh; the poor Mormon came in last and joined most heartily, when it appeared so
manifest, that both he and his scheme were perfectly alike in respect to substance—nothing but
wind—that I gave it up. Indeed, I felt a degree of shame that I had gone out to hunt so small
game, that I had bent my bow and filled my hand with arrows, and gone forth to war with a
wren.
This feeling was not a little increased, by hearing him declare, as he did in the course of a
few hours, that he regarded Jo Smith as standing on the same level with Moses! except that Jo,
was the better man of the two!!
Z––—a